Jump to Navigation

Me on Twitter

  • RT @AskJamesApp: Merci à tous!! Trop fier de notre second prix! #BMAopentourisme #75 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • RT @Etalab: Prix Bouches du Rhône Tourisme : 1. #Groovons @papou31 2. #AskJames 3. @TerroirCaisse #BMAOpenTourisme http://t.co/DrqPqyVN 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • Ary, than et @louistouzet ont terminé la préz de #AskJamesApp ... Relax now! 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • RT @AskJamesApp: Il parait que nos tweets sont retransmis en direct, alors retweetez #BMAopentourisme #75 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • @AskJamesApp et le twitter de notre projet ! 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • Après une nuit blanche, dur de suivre le speech de martin görner #bmaopentourisme http://t.co/p918JqOG 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • Début du week-end #bmaopentourisme la télé est là ! http://t.co/rjrCeYG3 11 years 26 weeks ago
  • RT @spencerchen: PhoneGap built mobile apps are being rejected by Apple for not being 'native enough': http://t.co/q7Rcbfhc 11 years 27 weeks ago
  • Using 3rd party modules sometimes occurs problems with deprecated APIs http://t.co/KvBLvjg9 Anyway Twitter for #Drupal helps me a lot 11 years 27 weeks ago
  • @louistouzet @CedN on verra sur place... 11 years 27 weeks ago

Python versus Shell scripting : from experience

A quick "pros & cons" to choose between Python or Shell scripting, from what I've observed through the years.

This could probably apply to other high level script languages* vs shell.

* Like Ruby, but not like Perl, as it shares more with shells from my point of view, like unreadable syntax and execution speed.

Python vs Shell

Choose Python for :

  • its simple syntax : can be read even by non Python-speaking people. End users may not be scared to change scripts to fit their need.
  • portability : Python is actually more portable than shell because of ease of installation for any OS. Shell is theoretically portable but it's complicated to explain end users how to install the runtime (e.g. see cygwin). A Python script can be packaged into an executable program. There may be ways to bundle a script with the shell runtime.

Choose Shell for :

  • speed : except in case of bad code logic, shell scripts are usually a lot faster than Python's equivalents.
  • its ease to deal with external programs and system : shell's syntax is already made to test/pipe/chain easily existing programs, whereas Python requires some extra boilerplate. Shell also has built-in functions to deal directly with files and the system, whereas Python uses an object-oriented model, which may not be as handy.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Vous pouvez activer la coloration syntaxique du code source à l'aide des balises suivantes: <code>, <blockcode>, <drupal5>, <drupal6>, <java>, <javascript>, <php>, <python>. The supported tag styles are: <foo>, [foo].
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.