Jump to Navigation

Me on Twitter

  • @louistouzet et suspense = buzz ;-) Etant donnée l'heure de mon tweet, peu de chances.. 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @ippontech plz... bon ou pas bon pour #devoxxfr ? 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • Jeu @IPPONTECH : le mot mystère est tatami 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @apkudo it's chrome on ubuntu. I'll send a ss 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @apkudo I've seen very good enhancements last days : still few visual bugs but you're on the good way ! 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @humble bundle 5 with #android looks less attractive than 4 + bids are going fast = I'll probably leave this one... 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @joenrv assisté à ta (super) prez hier : en voyant le nbre de tweets @falcon_android je comprends mieux le travail à fournir ;-) #GoodJob 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @louistouzet le stock de #nexus4 est remis à flot ! 11 years 3 weeks ago
  • @CedN "@DidierGirard: AngularJS, ce n'est pas pour jouer : http://t.co/Joh6cofBKn" 11 years 4 weeks ago
  • I should have read this article last week. It looks amazing ! The Official #Ubuntu Tablet Videos http://t.co/yCQMfebrdb 11 years 4 weeks ago

Python versus Shell scripting : from experience

A quick "pros & cons" to choose between Python or Shell scripting, from what I've observed through the years.

This could probably apply to other high level script languages* vs shell.

* Like Ruby, but not like Perl, as it shares more with shells from my point of view, like unreadable syntax and execution speed.

Python vs Shell

Choose Python for :

  • its simple syntax : can be read even by non Python-speaking people. End users may not be scared to change scripts to fit their need.
  • portability : Python is actually more portable than shell because of ease of installation for any OS. Shell is theoretically portable but it's complicated to explain end users how to install the runtime (e.g. see cygwin). A Python script can be packaged into an executable program. There may be ways to bundle a script with the shell runtime.

Choose Shell for :

  • speed : except in case of bad code logic, shell scripts are usually a lot faster than Python's equivalents.
  • its ease to deal with external programs and system : shell's syntax is already made to test/pipe/chain easily existing programs, whereas Python requires some extra boilerplate. Shell also has built-in functions to deal directly with files and the system, whereas Python uses an object-oriented model, which may not be as handy.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Vous pouvez activer la coloration syntaxique du code source à l'aide des balises suivantes: <code>, <blockcode>, <drupal5>, <drupal6>, <java>, <javascript>, <php>, <python>. The supported tag styles are: <foo>, [foo].
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.